出海雷达

Go 高级软件工程师,AI 训练

Go Senior Software Engineer, AI Training

AI开发工程全球可投(据职位描述推断)
公司G2i
薪资$100 - $200
工作地点Worldwide
地域资格全球可投(据职位描述推断)
时区要求日间重叠约 9 小时,基本正常作息
用工类型Contractor
发布时间今天
数据来源Himalayas
前往 Himalayas 查看并投递 →
全球可投:该职位未限制候选人所在地区。仍需注意薪资可能按地区折算,以及实际签约方式(正式雇佣 / 独立合同)。

Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week
Check out this Loom video for more details:
We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.
This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.
What this role actually is
You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:
• Whether the response makes sense

  • Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
  • Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment
  • Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer

This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.
What you'll be doing

  • Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end
  • Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think
  • Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code
  • Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)
  • Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading
  • Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code

What we mean by "taste"
We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:

  • Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
  • Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
  • Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?
  • Would this interaction build or erode trust?

You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.
Who you are

  • Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)
  • Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python
  • Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor
  • Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows
  • Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line
  • Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement
  • Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback
  • High bar for what good engineering looks like

Nice to have

  • Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows
  • Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards

Engagement details

  • Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location

• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible

  • Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well
  • Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat
  • Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview

Originally posted on Himalayas

本页面信息整理自 Himalayas,版权归原发布方所有。职位可能随时关闭,投递请以原始页面为准。 本站只做信息聚合展示,不参与招聘流程,也不向求职者收取任何费用。

该公司其他在招职位

高级工程师

G2iWorldwide$50 - $150Full Time12 天前
开发工程全球可投(据职位描述推断)

资深工程师

G2iWorldwide$120 - $200Full Time12 天前
开发工程全球可投(据职位描述推断)

← 返回全部职位